Wednesday, April 22, 2015

The History of the Kodak Brownie

Lightroom Tutorial

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBK7icaDhNA

Giovanna. My photographer is a famous reporter: Carol Guzy

Carol Guzy

    As Eugene Smith once said, “Let truth be the prejudice.” The photographer Carol Guzy reminded, continuing, “A photograph can be a powerful witness and an eloquent voice for those who have none. Pictures inform, educate, enlighten, captivate, and spur governments into action. They are historical documents and poignant reminders of our human frailties. Sometimes they touch our very souls.”

Carol Guzy



Carol Guzy grew up in a working class family in Bethlehem and studied in public schools. Her father died when she was young remaining alone with her ill mother. Instead of becoming  a nurse as she was asked by her family, she enrolled in the Art Institute of Fort Lauderdale, completing a two-year photography course. Eventually, he professor Walter Michot introduced her to photojournalism. The Miami Herald first recognized her talent, hiring her in the journal. In the following years she travelled to Africa, Louisiana, Kosovo, Germany, Albania, States ,  and many other places, witnessing the suffering and grief of victims in many places around the world and at the same time recalling the marvelous highlighted side that each of them has the right to shine.[1] However, the place that she found most attractive and inspiring for her work was Haiti. In an interview she said, “It’s not me, it’s Haiti. I have been to a lot of places. Haiti is the most intense—both positive and negative. The Haitian spirit touches your soul. After the quake, the Haitians mourned, they prayed, they cried, they picked themselves up and moved along. It’s unnerving. “After eight years from her graduation in Fort Lauderdale, she moved to Washington where she won her first Pulitzer in 1986 for news photography in Haiti. However, she later won other two Pulitzer Prizes.

The artist released many interview and wrote herself many essays that help to read her pictures. However, the perception of her work is very immediate. In fact, through the interviews of the artist, it emerges her intent with the camera and her idea of photography, which confirms her intent of spontaneity ,not intended to alter the pictures and facts represented. In fact, she stresses, the human side, which, as she says, is “a privilege” for the photographer and the viewer to “witness” and report to the world.

In terms of photographic style, her pictures show that she gives lot of importance to the “moment “rather than looking for the right aperture or shutter. This is, in fact, again explained in more than one interview of the artist, when  she talks of the value of the “light we glimpse within every being” which is more important than the objective “right light” to catch in the atmosphere. This attention to the soul, putting her not behind the lens, yet as a human, within all the feelings and emotions, witnessing with the lens of the camera the same moment that helpless people experienced with their real eyes, is what makes her photographs unique. Also her profound motivation to follow her artistic vacation of photography, overcoming the necessity of her family to have her to have a concrete job compared to art, strongly emerges through her images.

Carol’s concern seems to be to bring out the issue of separation between reality and media; sufferance and lack of empathy with the sufferance of people who cannot leave their reality. Her images become a place of meditation, a place to experience; a didactic-empathic-aesthetic guide toward the life most us think is helpless.  Furthermore, she seems to bring out issues that concern human behavior that she finds “horrific”, in order to pose a quest and stress how it is an individual responsibility to change things.

 “At times I reflect on just why we do this. There’s certainly an emotional toll from witnessing man’s inhumanity, especially covering stories in places like Haiti and Rwanda.”



                                           Carol Guzy



 Guzy’s often uses the rule of the third in her photos, however always giving importance first to the emotions of the characters portrait and their spontaneity, and as a mirror effect, provoking the same sensation in the viewer. Sometimes, in order to convey a great deal of emotions, her choice is to use only one hue of color instead of a more realistic bright colors choice. [2]Furthermore, she seems to naturally arrange the light in the compositions in order to stress the role of the characters and grab the viewers’ attention. Other methods found in Guzy’s style, to put in evidence her focal point, is the adoption of a brightening effect that she puts on the subject of her interest. For instance, we can see this in the picture that won the Pulitzer Price in 2000, where, in fact, not the boy is brightest element of the composition attracting the viewer’s attention over the rest of the image.


 The culture contex, the stereotypes , and the individual biases are all elements that the artist fully respects and of which promotes the value. In fact, her work adheres to the professional standards that photojournalism requires, yet, takes and asks for each individual moral responsibility to do so. Her pictures respect and celebrate the private moment and essential content of it .In fact, she demonstrates dignity, sensibility, objectivity, to visually reports the people, the environment, and the so intimate and universal sufferance of the human being she represents.








Figure 1


Agim Shala, 2, is passed through barbed wire fencing at an Arab camp as members of his family are reunited after feeling Kosovo. This image is part of the portfolio that won the 2000 Pulitzer in feature photography. According to Guzy, “Family members were greeting relatives they had through were dead…It was a happy moment.” [3]

This picture is one example in which Guzy shows a preference for colors and brightness, especially in the main focus of the composition, the baby. In fact, this contributes to creates in the viewer a feeling  of empathetic emotional link, also thanks to the movement of the baby toward us which almost call us to grab him. Here, the realistic effect is strong as in all her photographs. However, this is due more to the moment captured than to the technical skills , which however is represented at best, embodying perfectly the right composition ,colors, light to represent at best the subjects and their profound feelings.




Figure 2


An earthquake killed 230000 Haitians, left 1,5 millions homeless, and flattened cities and towns, particularly the county’s capital, Port-au-Prince. Guzy caught a couple walking hand in hand past burning building littered with dead bodies. “It was a sweet moment, amid Armageddon. So Haitian-they up and move on, regardless of what befalls them.”[4]

In this picture the focus is on the couple and the photographer creates a contrast using the pre-existing light coming from the background, giving to the picture an impression of delicacy and reality. The eye is drawn spontaneously on the focal point of the composition, as per her style, since she probably did not even set rationally the rule of three even if here it seems to dominate. However, what first grabs our attention, are the emotions permeating the scene; in fact, she is able to capture the moment and fix the feeling to make it perceivable to us. The dynamic  aspect of the picture, as in the previous one, is a common aspect of her photographs, stirring up the physical immobility, encouraging a movement of hope and reaction. In this picture, the characters vanish both into darkness and into whiteness. As Arnheim points out in his studies on visual perception, this effect reminds of the Japanese painter Sesshu(image 3) [5], where mountains emerge from fog so that viewers imagination is required to complete the meaning of the image. As figure 2 shows, the appearance and disappearance sensation, provokes and invite the viewer for a reflection not to forget the suffer of these people.

Image 3



                                                          

Image 4


Memunatu Mansaray imitates the Statue of Liberty, America’s symbol of freedom, during a charity boat tour. She came to the United States with a group of Sierra Leonean war amputees to receive prosthetic limbs in 2000. They had endured rebel brutality, but their vitality and spirit remained intact. [6]

This picture shows a swallow depth of field with the young girl sharp depicted in the foreground. The use of black and white for this photograph gives more importance to the feeling, since here color might have had represented a distraction from the main and only focus of the composition. As we can read in the caption, Guzy calls by name the little girl, giving importance to one over many similar stories which have been forgotten and that otherwise would not be considered. Furthermore, she shows respect toward the sensibility of the Sierra Leonean war amputees, portraying the most vulnerable victims, a young girl , imitating the Statue of Liberty at her shoulder with the unawareness and innocence that only children have. In this way she open the doors of hope even in a tragic story, being able to catch the essence of a moment of joy. Everything preserves the natural, untouched, vulnerable looking and Guzy’s subjects confirm this; the most spontaneous being in the world, victims and children.












Work Cited


   “Carol Guzy.” The Washington Post. The Washington Post Company, n.d. Web. 10 Feb. 2013.

  Gross, Larry P. Image Ethics in the Digital Age. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.


  Arnheim, Rudolf. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. New Version, Expanded and Rev. ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.








[1] Carol Guzy in first person in a written essey talks of this.
[2] We can see this in picture 4.
[3] Source and credit : Carol Guzy/The Washington Post
[4] Source and credit: Carol Guzy/ The Washington post via Getty Images
[5] Sesshu , Image 3
[6] Source :  Carol Guzy/ Alaska Quarterly Review

Horst Faas- Octavia


Photographer: Horst Faas

Brief Background:
“Born in Berlin, Germany, Faas began his photographic career in 1951 with the Keystone Agency, and by the age of 21 he was already covering major events concerning Indochina, including the peace negotiations in Geneva in 1954. In 1956 he joined the Associated Press (AP), where he acquired a reputation for being an unflinching hard-news war photographer, covering the wars in Vietnam and Laos, as well as in the Congo and Algeria. In 1962, he became AP’s chief photographer for Southeast Asia, and was based in Saigon until 1974. His images of the Vietnam War won him a Pulitzer Prize in 1965. In 1967 he was severely wounded in the legs by an RPG (rocket-propelled grenade) and used a wheelchair for the rest of his life. In 1972, he collected a second Pulitzer, for his coverage of the conflict in Bangladesh. Inside Bangladesh, photographer Rashid Talukder considered it too dangerous to publish his photographs and he released them more than twenty years after Horst's photographs had appeared.

Faas is also famed for his work as a picture editor, and was instrumental in ensuring the publication of two of the most famous images of the Vietnam War. The notorious "Saigon Execution" photograph, showing the summary execution of a Vietcong prisoner by Saigon police chief Nguyen Ngoc Loan, taken by Eddie Adams in Saigon on February 1, 1968 was sent under his direction. Nick Ut's famous "Napalm Girl" photograph caused a huge controversy over at the AP bureau; an editor had objected to the photo, saying that the girl depicted was naked and that nobody would accept it. Faas ordered that Ut's photo be sent over the wire.

In September 1990, freelance photographer Greg Marinovich submitted a series of graphic photos of a crowd executing a man to the AP bureau in Johannesburg. Once again, AP editors were uncertain if the photos should be sent over the wire. One editor sent the images to Faas, who telegrammed back, "send all photos."

In 1976, Faas moved to London as AP’s senior photo editor for Europe; he retired in 2004. In retirement he organized reunions of the wartime Saigon press corps and ran international photojournalism symposiums.

He produced four books on his career and other news photographers, including Requiem, a book about photographers killed on both sides of the Vietnam War, co-edited with fellow Vietnam War photojournalist Tim Page.”
                                                                                                                        - Wikipedia

Title of work: 



Location: Binh Gia, Saigon

Time: January 1965

1. What was your first impression when viewing the photo?
When viewing this photo I immediately thought of the different perspectives present in this photo. There are five men in focus facially, with their body language also revealing a story.


2. What does the work look like to you?
This photo looks like a war photo, due to the uniform and weapons taken during midday.

3. What is the subject of the photo?
There are numerous subjects in this photo but there are five main characters in focus.

4. What textures, colors, and shapes are there?
The photo was taken with black and white film, with the sun creating a lighter section casting over the subjects.

5. What about line, forms and space?
The lines are not only formed by the trees, but the natural light coming through them, and the form and space is created by the five men.

Analysis:
  1. What stands out and draws your eye in this photo
In this photo, I am immediately drawn to each of the subject’s facial expressions and the sun seeping through the trees.  

  1. How is the photograph organized in terms of design elements (line, space, etc)
Considering the line, form and shape the photograph is organized well, diagonal lines are created by sun rays, the soldiers and the trees create vertical lines, and each subject is naturally spaced.

  1. What about contrast, rhythm, balance, proportion?
The top of the photo is a lot lighter than the rest of the photo because it was taken on a sunny day, resulting in a significant difference in contrast for the lower portion of the photograph. I think the rhythm is maintained.


Interpretation
  1. What is the photo about
The photo is set during the Vietnam War and it portrays what appears to be an average day during a time of war.

  1. What is the message of the photographer?
For the photographer, he may be communicating a false sense f reality, where there’s no danger, a reality where the calmness of the sun relaxes them, not having to be on constant alert. The reality is that there is no calmness, moment of peace and they are constantly on alert.

  1. Does the photo have a purpose?
This photo, like most of his work was taken to reveal the tragedies, doubts and courage that comes up during times of war.

  1. What feelings do you get from the photo?
From this photo I feel a strong sense of curiosity, I’m curious about the various perspectives represented in this photo. Each individual tells his own story through his facial expression & body position.

  1. Does it remind you of something?
Nothing in particular.

Evaluation
  1. Did your first impression change, and why?
My first impression of this photo has not changed.

  1. Do you think it is a successful photo?
I think this was a successful photo because it captures multiple perspectives in the way that the sun highlights the hidden story of each individual.

  1. Is it unique?
While this photo resembles many other war photos, this photograph is unique because it captures incredible light during a dark time.

  1. Could you do it better?
Excluding the location of the photograph, I could possibly replicate this photograph because it’s not a photo capturing a woman running away, there’s not much action but I couldn’t improve upon it.

  1. Can you readily understand the subject matter, and do the design elements (space, form, line, shape, color, texture) help you to do so?
Yes, I think I readily understand the subject matter because the design elements like line, shape, and color creates a particular message and set the tone of the photo.

  1. Was the photo well planned, in your opinion?
In my opinion the photo was not planned, it appears to be natural because it was a casual day where the soldiers were not yet facing any immediate conflicts or dangers.

  1. Would you buy it or hang it in your home?
I would buy it, but not hang it up in my home.

  1. Have you learned anything that you could apply to your own photography?
In terms of my own photography, I think I should take more advantage of the sun, manipulating it, where I create an angle that is in between the possibility of being overexposed and underexposed. This evident in the way the trees shelter some of the light.

  1. Does the photo inspire you?
The photo does not inspire me because it does not directly relate to any of my experiences but I understand how this photo can recreate a sense of hope.




Source: http://blogs.denverpost.com/captured/2012/05/15/photographer-collection-horst-faas-vietnam/5689/